Network participants
Federations, network bodies, shared-service teams, and programme coordinators supporting multiple SACCO or MFI institutions.
Partners
Network-level discussions should define the group structure, shared controls, and rollout order before any common delivery model is assumed.
The main question is usually how the network is organised and which functions are shared, controlled centrally, or left to each participating institution.
The opening discussion should not jump to product claims. It should establish the network structure, the support model, and the order in which institutions or services would move.
Federations, network bodies, shared-service teams, and programme coordinators supporting multiple SACCO or MFI institutions.
How the group is structured, which controls are shared, what reporting sits at network level, and how rollout sequencing should be handled.
Network structure, institution mix, shared services in scope, reporting expectations, and the coordination questions needing early review.
Clarify whether the network operates through a federation, shared-service layer, branch hierarchy, or separate institutions under one programme.
Identify which approvals, reporting responsibilities, support functions, and operational rules sit at network level versus institution level.
Decide whether the programme starts with a pilot group, a central service layer, or a phased institution-by-institution rollout.
Next step
That gives the team enough context to judge whether the next step is pilot planning, support design, or a broader rollout conversation.